ubles having to remote their objects, and having to manage
lazy loading
in such contexts) and for javaFX itself.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Andrey Razumovsky [mailto:razumovsky.and...@gmail.com]
Inviato: martedì 9 marzo 2010 22.34
A: user@cayenne.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: Cayenne and GWT
Yeah, I
pect). I'm hoping in javaFX,
> where
> > porting cayenne clients shouldn't be hard, since javaFX engine is built
> > ontop of a JVM.
> >
> >
> > -Messaggio originale-
> > Da: Andrey Razumovsky [mailto:razumovsky.and...@gmail.com]
> > Inviato: lunedì 8 m
cayenne clients shouldn't be hard, since javaFX engine is built
> ontop of a JVM.
>
>
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Andrey Razumovsky [mailto:razumovsky.and...@gmail.com]
> Inviato: lunedì 8 marzo 2010 9.37
> A: user@cayenne.apache.org
> Oggetto: Re: Cayenne and GW
where
porting cayenne clients shouldn't be hard, since javaFX engine is built
ontop of a JVM.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Andrey Razumovsky [mailto:razumovsky.and...@gmail.com]
Inviato: lunedì 8 marzo 2010 9.37
A: user@cayenne.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: Cayenne and GWT
John,
I committed the
e loadable
> detachables.
>
> I would love to contribute, keep me posted..
> John-
>
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Andrey Razumovsky <
> razumovsky.and...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi John (and others working with Cayenne and GWT)!
> >
> > Are yo
serialize some of our smaller items and not be forced to use loadable
detachables.
I would love to contribute, keep me posted..
John-
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Andrey Razumovsky <
razumovsky.and...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi John (and others working with Cayenne and GWT)!
>
> Are you s
Hi John (and others working with Cayenne and GWT)!
Are you still interested in the subject?
I've been doing some research and on the surface the first results look very
promising.
In a couple of words, I bet you can use your CDOs on client without any
other branch of generated classes and wi
