On Sep 13, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Gary Jarrel wrote:
> I have an annotation similar to
> CacheGroups but it goes further into tracking whether an object should
> be cached in local or shared cache.
Also keep in mind that Cayenne uses QueryCache for caching query results. There
is still a separate ca
I'm testing a DataChannelFilter very similar to
CacheInvalidationFilter with a few extras mainly invalidating groups
in either Shared or Local caches. I have an annotation similar to
CacheGroups but it goes further into tracking whether an object should
be cached in local or shared cache.
I'll dig
Not quite sure what you are planning to test, but my guess would be you need to
use NestedQueryCache instance.
Andrus
On Sep 13, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Gary Jarrel wrote:
> Ahhh I see :) so what is the best way to test local and shared cache
> from the point of view of adding and removing objects?
>
Ahhh I see :) so what is the best way to test local and shared cache
from the point of view of adding and removing objects?
garyj
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik
wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Gary Jarrel wrote:
>
>> now what I am finding is that both domainCache and c
On Sep 13, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Gary Jarrel wrote:
> now what I am finding is that both domainCache and contextCache is the
> same object, when I would have though they would have been two
> different instance of OSQueryCache given that one is the local cache
> and the other is the shared cache.
Yo
Hi All Again,
Still doing testing on the new configuration and rewriting some code
to 3.1, and have come across the following issue:
My configuration code again:
Module extensions = new Module() {
@Override
public void configure(Binder binder) {
binder.bind(QueryCache.class).to(O
