Yeah, sounds good! Thanks!
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:22 AM Malcolm Edgar
wrote:
> That sounds like a great approach to me.
>
> regards Malcolm
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:49 PM Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 9, 2020, at 5:54 PM, John Huss wrote:
> > >
> > > 2) Regarding skip
That sounds like a great approach to me.
regards Malcolm
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:49 PM Andrus Adamchik
wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 9, 2020, at 5:54 PM, John Huss wrote:
> >
> > 2) Regarding skipping parsing when just going straight back out again to
> > serialization - I have felt the reluctance (
> On Jun 9, 2020, at 5:54 PM, John Huss wrote:
>
> 2) Regarding skipping parsing when just going straight back out again to
> serialization - I have felt the reluctance (like you) of parsing this in
> those cases. But one thing to think about is that the parser/serializer
> (let's say Jackson i