Re: Types.OTHER

2020-06-15 Thread John Huss
Yeah, sounds good! Thanks! On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:22 AM Malcolm Edgar wrote: > That sounds like a great approach to me. > > regards Malcolm > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:49 PM Andrus Adamchik > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 2020, at 5:54 PM, John Huss wrote: > > > > > > 2) Regarding skip

Re: Types.OTHER

2020-06-15 Thread Malcolm Edgar
That sounds like a great approach to me. regards Malcolm On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:49 PM Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > > > On Jun 9, 2020, at 5:54 PM, John Huss wrote: > > > > 2) Regarding skipping parsing when just going straight back out again to > > serialization - I have felt the reluctance (

Re: Types.OTHER

2020-06-15 Thread Andrus Adamchik
> On Jun 9, 2020, at 5:54 PM, John Huss wrote: > > 2) Regarding skipping parsing when just going straight back out again to > serialization - I have felt the reluctance (like you) of parsing this in > those cases. But one thing to think about is that the parser/serializer > (let's say Jackson i