ERXKey is in cayenne 4.0 and is called Property and the default templates
create them for you.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:42 PM Joseph Senecal wrote:
> >
> > Can you give us a short summary of what features Wonder would bring to a
> Cayenne developer?
>
> My favorite Project Wonder extension for E
I was curious about what you could accomplish with EventManager listeners.
I have a scenario where I normally use the Cayenne lifecycle callbacks to
detect when an Object was updated, and “sync” it to an external system.
class SalesOrder {
void sync() {
// send data to ex
>
> Can you give us a short summary of what features Wonder would bring to a
> Cayenne developer?
My favorite Project Wonder extension for EOF would be the automatically
generated ERXKeys.
The Project Wonder template would generate a base class with all the getters
and setters for a class (bu
> Do we still have the model converter out there?
We do.
> even back then there were some rough edges.
And there are :)
Andrus
> On Sep 14, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>
> There's a lot of ex-EOF/ex-WO folks involved with this project (including me).
>
> Do we still have th
There's a lot of ex-EOF/ex-WO folks involved with this project (including me).
Do we still have the model converter out there? When I started using
Cayenne back in the 1.1 days, we had a converter tool that would
create a cayenne project out of an EOF project. I'm not sure if it's
still around
Hi Hugi, if you are using an older Cayenne (3.0/3.1), I have a set of
utility functions to do count/sum/avg/min/max with expressions. If using a
newer version, perhaps Andrus' changes will help you. Let me know if you
want the older versions.
mrg
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Hugi Thordarso
> On Sep 14, 2015, at 5:37 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>
>>
>> Can you give us a short summary of what features Wonder would bring to a
>> Cayenne developer?
>
> Since Wonder is targeted towards WebObjects development I don’t think the
> typical Cayenne developer will gain a lot of features a
Hi Lon,
This is probably doable, but won't be clean or easy. Maybe instead we can
rethink the scope of your ObjectContexts. So a few questions:
1. What are you using for the web framework? Is that Tapestry or something
else?
2. What is the current scope of ObjectContexts? Is that ObjectContext
>> I've started working on a proposal for the WebObjects-world to migrate
>> Project Wonder to Cayenne,
>
> Sounds great. Its been a long time since I was in the WO world, and although
> I used Project Wonder way back then, I find it hard to remember where EOF
> stopped and Wonder started.
Tha
