Yes please open a bug report with a stack trace.
Andrus
On Sep 27, 2011, at 12:41 AM, Bruno René Santos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was trying to use java.util.Set as the base of my relationships as my GUI
> framework uses it a lot. The problem was that on this piece of code:
>
> // TODO: Andrus
Great news guys, well done.
Do you have a view as to when 3.1 will go into RC phase?
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> We are glad to announce 3.1M3 release of Cayenne. This is an important
> milestone on our way to Beta. In fact there is a good ch
Hello all,
I was trying to use java.util.Set as the base of my relationships as my GUI
framework uses it a lot. The problem was that on this piece of code:
// TODO: Andrus 1/31/2006 - IncrementalFaultList is not properly
// transferred between contexts
Thanks for help.
To document this for future users, the DI approach then looks something like
this:
import org.apache.cayenne.configuration.DefaultRuntimeProperties;
import org.apache.cayenne.di.Binder;
import org.apache.cayenne.di.Module;
public class AppModule implements Module {
public void
This is a good recipe for 3.0. In 3.1 you are allowed to merge multiple
projects when creating a ServerRuntime, so you can merge multiple mappings to
get the behavior that you need. However... Are you sure you want to switch
DataNodes? DataNodes by themselves don't have many configuration proper
Hi John,
This is completely untested, but try something like:
Configuration configuration = Configuration.getSharedConfiguration();
DataDomain dataDomain = configuration.getDomain();
DataMap dataMap = dataDomain.getMap("my map name");
DataNode oldNode = dataDomain.getNode("old node name);
Dat
At runtime how do I switch my model to use a different data node that was
previously defined in the in model? I'm using trunk.
Thanks,
John
Probably. I'll try to remember to do that at home and attach my test
project as a demo/example of the issue.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Bruno René Santos wrote:
> It seems like a bug yes... Do you think A ticket should be created?
>
> Thanx
> Bruno
>
> No dia 24 de Set de 2011 15:36, "Mich
It seems like a bug yes... Do you think A ticket should be created?
Thanx
Bruno
No dia 24 de Set de 2011 15:36, "Michael Gentry"
escreveu:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> I just wrote a small test-case which used:
>
> Source -> Middle ->> Target
>
> Using source.getMiddle().getTargets() succeeds, but using
> so
> I want to delete a row from a particular table. Unfortunately
> the table in question has a FK constraint to another table,
> which in turn has a FK constraint back to the table in question.
> Even the latest version of MySql (I tried 5.5) does constraint
> checking on a per-statement rather than
We are glad to announce 3.1M3 release of Cayenne. This is an important
milestone on our way to Beta. In fact there is a good chance that the next
release will be announced as Beta. Upgrade to M3 is strongly recommended to all
3.1 users, as it contains some critical bug fixes. The highlights of t
11 matches
Mail list logo