Hi,
not sure if you subscribed to the list and receiving the traffic from the list
or only the emails cc'd to your address, as there were other replies in this
thread. I am cc'ing now, but you may want to check the archive for the ongoing
discussion.
On Sep 13, 2011, at 10:16 PM, stéphane Les
>http://cayenne.apache.org/doc20/understanding-transactions.html
Thanks for the link. In fact, I already
read almost all the Cayenne documentation
http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/understanding-transactions.html (which I think
more recent)
>I use Cayenne in a fairly straight
forward manner, and pe
On Sep 13, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Marek Šabo wrote:
> Tomcat uses HashMap to store filters so order of initialization is not
> guaranteed
Wow. That would be a major bug in Tomcat. IIRC the servlet spec is quite
explicit about the order of filters being the same as their declarations in
web.xml.
yes it should. Make sure your filter is initialized before you call the code
above and the filter name in web.xml is the same as your Cayenne XML file name.
Andrus
I managed to hack this. Tomcat uses HashMap to store filters so order of
initialization is not guaranteed (which of course happen
Hi there,
See other replies in this thread. I can only add that Cayenne is as mature as
Hibernate, and has its own approaches to a set of persistence problems (so if
you are looking for 1..1 correspondence, there won't be one). Cayenne most
certainly can be and has been integrated with all kind
Yes, 3.0.x is the "stable" supported branch of Cayenne.
3.1 is "alpha". It is being used in production too (I do it on a number of
projects). The biggest risk with it is fast API evolution, so when you upgrade
between 3.1 milestones, you'd have to check your code for incompatibilities.
And of
At one point, there was a Spring with Cayenne example by Andrus. Not
sure how dated it is now.
https://cwiki.apache.org/CAY/spring-integration-examples.html
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:41 AM, stéphane Lestoclet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The Cayenne documentation states the following :
>
> Chapter: Und
I just wanted to verify 3.0 is the version recommended for production code.
(Just wanted to make sure I didn't miss anything with all the discussion over
3.1. I am currently using 3.0.1 for my "production" demo.)
This is probably a moot question anyway because I have found that Cayenne dev
ve
Then I'd look closer at #3. Something related to what happened in the app
between the 2 events.
E.g. one common mistake is using a cross-thread shared ObjectContext (or its
objects) to modify and commit objects.
Andrus
On Sep 13, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi Andrus,
>
Hi Andrus,
thanks for the comments. I will check that again and come back on
thursday with the answer (currently on travel).
What bugs me really is that it works sometimes, and sometimes not. Can
this behavior be explained with Michaels/your suggestions?
Cheers
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, A
On Sep 13, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Gary Jarrel wrote:
> I have an annotation similar to
> CacheGroups but it goes further into tracking whether an object should
> be cached in local or shared cache.
Also keep in mind that Cayenne uses QueryCache for caching query results. There
is still a separate ca
I'm testing a DataChannelFilter very similar to
CacheInvalidationFilter with a few extras mainly invalidating groups
in either Shared or Local caches. I have an annotation similar to
CacheGroups but it goes further into tracking whether an object should
be cached in local or shared cache.
I'll dig
I haven't read the entire thread, only the messages quoted below.
Michael's advise is absolutely correct. However the initial code worked because
the Role was likely already registered in the context, so the UserRoles was
pulled automatically in the same context.
So ... a few things to check:
Not quite sure what you are planning to test, but my guess would be you need to
use NestedQueryCache instance.
Andrus
On Sep 13, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Gary Jarrel wrote:
> Ahhh I see :) so what is the best way to test local and shared cache
> from the point of view of adding and removing objects?
>
Ahhh I see :) so what is the best way to test local and shared cache
from the point of view of adding and removing objects?
garyj
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik
wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Gary Jarrel wrote:
>
>> now what I am finding is that both domainCache and c
Hi folks,
i tried this, i didn't work. Any more ideas?
One thing I should note: it doesn'ht happen all the time
unfortunately. Its only sometimes and I really don't know why.
More ideas appreciated
Cheers
Christian
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
>
On Sep 13, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Marek Šabo wrote:
> Oj I see, so I'm probably not gonna use @Inject anywhere?
Except in your own Cayenne extensions that you'll load in Cayenne container.
> I managed to upgrade configure from 3.0 to 3.1 but I don't know how to add
> extended types. I used to do it
Oj I see, so I'm probably not gonna use @Inject anywhere?
I managed to upgrade configure from 3.0 to 3.1 but I don't know how to
add extended types. I used to do it in wicket init method (wicket filter
is second in web.xml, both are mapped to /*) but now I got nullpointer
when I do this:
On Sep 13, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Gary Jarrel wrote:
> now what I am finding is that both domainCache and contextCache is the
> same object, when I would have though they would have been two
> different instance of OSQueryCache given that one is the local cache
> and the other is the shared cache.
Yo
Hi All Again,
Still doing testing on the new configuration and rewriting some code
to 3.1, and have come across the following issue:
My configuration code again:
Module extensions = new Module() {
@Override
public void configure(Binder binder) {
binder.bind(QueryCache.class).to(O
20 matches
Mail list logo
