Thanks for putting up with me. If I have time I will run the debug
tonight. We will see if I am smart enough to figure it out.
On Nov 7, 2010 6:04 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Your test indicates that JDBC part is ok, but still the Modeler somehow
ignores your tables... I am a bit
Hi all,
Would it be possible to generate entities not as children of
CayenneDataobject but as self composite objects with a CDO field? I'm
not gonna ask for implementation - I'm just curios if I may redefine
such behavior in my projects. Because sometimes we work with API that
really, really
Very odd. Please file a Jira. Maybe we can reproduce it with our unit tests? So
what is optimistically locked in this case?
Andrus
On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> It even fails if I include the dependent:
>
>
>DataContext dataContext = DataContext.createDataContext
> List movs = new ArrayList();
> for (HoMovimentosAplicacoes mov : apl.getHoMovimentosAplicacoesArray())
> movs.add(mov);
> for (int i = 0; i < movs.size(); i++)
> apl.removeFromHoMovimentosAplicacoesArray(movs.get(i));
> manager.getContext().deleteObjects(movs);
So do you actually cal
Hi Mark,
Your test indicates that JDBC part is ok, but still the Modeler somehow ignores
your tables... I am a bit at a loss what to recommend now. It all works on my
own tests. The only way to gather insight into what's really going on is
running the Modeler in Eclipse debugger and stepping th
