Hi Tomas,
Yeah, I think attachments are stripped from the list messages automatically on
the server. Are you using the Windows or Mac Modeler? Both are pre configured
to run with 0.5 GB of heap space, but maybe -Xmx is getting lost along the way.
Andrus
On Sep 24, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Tomas Sten
Hi,
I'm modelling a series of database and objectentities and when I add one
of the relations and try to synch it, it asks if I want to remove
foreign keys mapped as object attributes, and I say yes and the CPU goes
into a spin and the heap blows up see stacktrace at end.
If I do the same ag
On 24/09/10 7:43 AM, Marek Šabo wrote:
sorry, my first post was probably confusing.
I could do it programmatically but I want to know if it is possible with
cayenne sorting engine, paraphrased, Can I modify sort order property
for cayenne somehow, e.g. as MySQL function INET_ATON()?
Meanwhile I
Hi Michael,
sorry, my first post was probably confusing.
I could do it programmatically but I want to know if it is possible with
cayenne sorting engine, paraphrased, Can I modify sort order property
for cayenne somehow, e.g. as MySQL function INET_ATON()?
Meanwhile I can create a template query
Hi Marek, are you asking if the database can do it or are you wanting
to do it in your application's memory with (or without) Cayenne?
mrg
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Marek Šabo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if there is a way to sort string(varchar) columns
> numerically. I know it'
marco turchi wrote:
>
> the problem is that using the moduler I'm not able to create an
> obj-relationship without create a new db-relationship. It means that I
> obtain more relationships than the relationships you shown me in the
> example
> (I obtain what I wrote in the previous email).
>
I
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a way to sort string(varchar) columns
numerically. I know it's bad design but legacy database can't be changed
atm. I'm talking about IPv4 columns, which we need to sort. ( In new
model I aim to store them as integers and map extra column in cayenne
with m
Yes.
On Sep 23, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Bruno René Santos wrote:
> My main problem was that I was having too many connections problems because
> each
> portlet has its own DataContext which will have its own connection pool. So
> what
> you saying is that I only need to configure a JNDI source for
My main problem was that I was having too many connections problems because each
portlet has its own DataContext which will have its own connection pool. So what
you saying is that I only need to configure a JNDI source for all portlets so
that all of them share a connection pool?
Bruno
-Mens
Haven't read the earlier messages. So you are using nested contexts already. In
this case a switch from the nested contexts to ROP will probably be less
noticeable performance-wise (communication between child and parent layers will
still be somewhat slower). Still extra unneeded complexity, so
On Sep 22, 2010, at 2:17 AM, b...@holos.pt wrote:
> Can I use a Cayenne client on each portlet and create a cayenne server on a
> servlet to receive their requests? this way all database communication is
> done by the servlet and not by all portlets.
This is possible, but it will add not insigni
11 matches
Mail list logo
