Sorry for my late reply.
On 28/05/2010 00:48, Bryan Lewis wrote:
> This email made me aware of that cool new removeGroup and OSCache features.
> Thanks. Two little howevers...
>
> In my testing, it worked only with LOCAL_CACHE, as the original poster
> said. Not a big deal for me; SHARED_CACHE
Hi Tore,
I finally got around to looking at your code in the jira
attachments. It looks like it will need a little bit of updating to get
it 3.0 ready, but at the end of the day it still pulls the whole thing
into memory at some point. I might ping you over the next week, if you
don'
Ah that's right. A local query cache is created that belongs to this
context only.
Not sure if we need to document it though. This is the internal
details that are likely to change between releases.
Andrus
On May 28, 2010, at 10:17 AM, Gary Jarrel wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:43 PM, A
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> it seems that domain.getQueryCache().size() is returning 1
>>
>> assertEquals(1, ((DataContext)
>> getDataContext()).getParentDataDomain().getQueryCache().size());
>> assertEquals(1, ((DataContext) getDataContext()).getQueryCache().size
