> I never said that "demo36" is an example of a
> program that has the issue
> I've described in past news!
> That sample correctly operates, because it does not
> use relationships
> defined as you described!
I applogize. That was my error :( : I falsely supposed
it's the same example because of
Well, it sounds like you did something like "task =
dataContext.newObject(Task.class)" and then "employee.setTask(task)",
which would definitely cause an insert of a new task (and the same for
department). If you have an existing task, it should only define the
relationship between the employee an
I'll try to provide the app but... not for today.
Anyway thanks for now.
Cheers,
Mauro
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Gentry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: help on saving obj using relations
Could you include a snippet of your
Could you include a snippet of your code?
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Mauro Carniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never said that "demo36" is an example of a program that has the issue
> I've described in past news!
> That sample correctly operates, because it does not use relationships
>
I never said that "demo36" is an example of a program that has the issue
I've described in past news!
That sample correctly operates, because it does not use relationships
defined as you described!
When I tried to define relationships using Cayenne modeler the problem on
inserting arised. I fo
I looked at:
http://oswing.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/oswing/trunk/srcdemo/demo36/auto/_EmpVO.java?revision=214&view=markup
And I don't believe you have modeled your relationships correctly.
You manually created a get/setDept() and get/setTask() in the
subclass:
http://oswing.svn.sourceforge.net
I guess Mauro forgot to mention an important aspect:
The situation appeared while integrating Cayenne with
OpenSwing:
http://oswing.sourceforge.net/
and the problem he describes can be seen/reproduced
from the code example in "srcdemo/demo36" from the
project's Sourceforge SVN repository:
http://
Hi Gustav,
You are completely right. I've wanted to do a DBEdit clone for
Cayenne (since DBEdit no longer runs on OS X/Leopard). I find that
tool to be amazingly valuable. The two options are to make a
standalone or to hack it into CM (which has a lot of good plumbing
needed already). Maybe th
> AFAIK no work has been done on that to date. No
> spare bandwidth :-/
I undersand :(.
It's a pitty that JPA seems to have a higher priority
than cayenne modeler :( .
Gustav.
P.S. Plug-ins would open the way to many contributions
that are not possible right now.
__
Hi!
Maybe someone in the past has already met this issue, so sorry if I ask it
again!
I've got 3 tables: employee, depts and tasks having 2 fk: one from employees to
depts and one from employees to tasks.
I've modeled both tables and relations using modeler.
After that I created a simple appli
AFAIK no work has been done on that to date. No spare bandwidth :-/
Andrus
On Apr 17, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Gustav Weber wrote:
Are there any changes to the state of the plugin
support in cayenne modeler?
Is there a final framework decided? Or maybe an
internal solution? Or maybe there are new
p
Are there any changes to the state of the plugin
support in cayenne modeler?
Is there a final framework decided? Or maybe an
internal solution? Or maybe there are new
players(plug-in frameworks) in the mean time?
More users (me included) would have improvements to
cayenne modeler if it would be p
So Cayenne calls the sp in the following format:
{? = call spXXX(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)}
In your JDBC test you do it like this:
{ call spXXX(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) }
I.e. no return value is specified. So what if you uncheck "returning
value" checkbox for this stored proc
OK I found my problem it, I had the foreign key in a related DbEntity
defined as a BINARY.
I will close the issue.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
>
> Hi Andrus,
> >
> > the
On Apr 17, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
Hi Andrus,
the column is a MySQL 5.0 BIGINT, I have tried changing this to an
INTEGER
and I still had the same problem.
regards Malcolm Edgar
So it is BIGINT on MySQL end and in the Cayenne model? Please
doublecheck that you don't map i
Hi Andrus,
the column is a MySQL 5.0 BIGINT, I have tried changing this to an INTEGER
and I still had the same problem.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
>
> Caused by: java.s
On Apr 17, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Cannot convert class [B to SQL
type requested due to java.lang.ClassCastException - [B
at
com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.setObject(PreparedStatement.java:
2744)
So I assume that "schema_config_oid" is
Some more analysis on this problem the ObjectId singleValue value is a
byte[] of the table primary key value "3456", and the ObjectId is returning
the raw byte array as the single primary key value.
This is making a mess of Cayenne refreshing objects, lazy loading, etc.
The environment I am using
18 matches
Mail list logo
