Yeah... Previously existing API that was not marked for deprecation
should remain fairly stable. Runtime, while undergoing a number of
changes, is still production quality. I am using it on a very active
live site...
Essentially the biggest risk is that the _new_ API introduced during
3.0
Hello all.
I am currently using CayenneModeler version 2.0.3 to reengineer a
database schema and generate the subsequent Java classes. Some of the
ObjEntity instances have primary/foreign keys mapped manually because
these keys are generated by another process (outside of the Cayenne
framework). T
Hello.
We are using M2 in production in a pretty busy system. We use only the
"classic cayenne" stuff, but it is working very well.
Regards,
- Tore.
On Nov 26, 2007, at 22:56, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to know peoples experience in using Cayenne 3.0M2 for
Production appli
Hi All,
I would like to know peoples experience in using Cayenne 3.0M2 for
Production applications, or is Cayenne 2.0.x still the recommended release.
I am looking a upgrading our Cayenne 1.2.x applications. By the way I like
the free search field in the Cayenne modeler.
regards Malcolm Edgar
Hi
I have worked around this problem by inverting the relationship (it
was one-to-one) and putting the fk on the other side. The problem I
have now is that there is no simple way of querying for objects with
this relationship set.
The schema I'm using has a Contact related to Student and/
Hi Marcin,
Probably a bug in faulting... The analysis below is from memory. I
haven't checked the code to confirm it :-). Cayenne always assumes
that if a given object contains an FK to a target object (non-
flattened to-one), that a target object exists. This can potentially
save a trip t
I use cayenne + tapestry a lot... would be nice to have a tapestry-
cayenne module, imo. Although I agree that integration is already
pretty trivial. I may put something together one of these days along
those lines.
Cheers,
Robert
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11/269:25 AM , Michael Gentry wrote:
I like the "Graduated!" banner at http://wicket.apache.org/ :-)
It has been a year or so since I last looked at Wicket (I've mostly
used Tapestry outside of WebObjects). Perhaps this brings up a
broader question of how should Cayenne try to interact and relate with
other Apache projects? Tapestr
oops... "heard" -> "had"
On Nov 26, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Me too. Never heard enough motivation to try Wicket, but if somebody
does a Cayenne tutorial with it, I might as well do it :-)
Andrus
On Nov 24, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Adrian Wiesmann wrote:
Hello all
Has anybody ex
Me too. Never heard enough motivation to try Wicket, but if somebody
does a Cayenne tutorial with it, I might as well do it :-)
Andrus
On Nov 24, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Adrian Wiesmann wrote:
Hello all
Has anybody experience using Cayenne with the Apache Wicket
Framework? I'd
be interested t
Chris,
I vaguely remember this being a problem in the past and us fixing
it... I couldn't find any references via Google (having "IN" as a
keyword doesn't help). So could you post the code that builds the
query and the exact Cayenne version.
Thanks
Andrus
On Nov 23, 2007, at 3:39 AM, Ch
yeah, still not implemented. Thanks for pointing it out, adding to my
long todo:
https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-716
Andrus
On Nov 23, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Philip Miller wrote:
Hi. This is an old one - I believe still waiting for implementation as
of 2.0.4.
Is there a Jira ref?
Here is a better version that takes into account superclass behavior:
public class SerializableDO extends CayenneDataObject {
private void writeObject(ObjectOutputStream out) throws IOException {
if (persistenceState == PersistenceState.COMMITTED) {
Hi Detlef,
I guess the easiest way to handle this is to restore default Java
serialization behavior, overriding CayenneDataObject context based
deserialization. E.g. you may use the following class as a customer
superclass of all your entity classes:
public class SerializableDO extends Ca
Would be nice to open a Jira with details. We should be able to do
something about it.
Andrus
On Nov 22, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Jan Lendholt wrote:
Okay, I found the error - I used a wrong datatype for the
matchExpression.
Well, in fact this is a stupid mistake by me; but in my opinion the
f
15 matches
Mail list logo
