Hi Kevin,
can I make direct use of a function in the Modeler jar to instantiate a
generate from my own app?
It would be good in Cayenne but I think it will be a long time before I
move to version 3. I don't want somebody to do all the work and it never
gets used.
Cheers,
Dave
Kevin Menar
Cheers Andrus. I'm just looking at the code now. Will give it a try.
Dave
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Dave,
You can use DbLoader class to reengineer DB from your code or build an
Ant task on top of it.
In fact if you map the entities as generic classes during
reengineering, you can use the gene
Off-hand, I can't say for certain. But, I had originally ported cgen (or
maybe cdbgen, I don't recall), based on the code in the modeler and it was
quite straightforward. Most of the modeler code is pretty well segmented
and you should be able to make calls into it by just adding the modeler JAR
For what it's worth, it's simple enough to call the schema generator
just by adding the modeler jar file to the classpath, so I'd expect
the reengineer task to be equally easy:
boolean notCleanState = true;
DbGenerator dbGenerator = new DbGenerator(dbAdapter, dataMap);
Dave,
You can use DbLoader class to reengineer DB from your code or build
an Ant task on top of it.
In fact if you map the entities as generic classes during
reengineering, you can use the generated DataMap in the application
right away, without a restart. I've done it on one project. IMO
Hi Dave,
There is not currently any ant task for that. The expectation has been that
you would generate the datamap once from the modeler, and then use the cgen
ant task to generate the classes. Now that Tore has added code in the
modeler for merging changes between the DB and the datamap, it ma
Hi,
is there an ant task to reengineer the database as you can with Cayenne
Modeler?
Cheers,
Dave
The code below should work. Another way is to use multi-step
prefetching on a root of to-many relationship.
Well, that's a good news so we shall probably implement my piece of
code for most relationships. However, I am afraid I didn't understand
your second sentence:-(
Now, it would s
