Hi,
we have three nodes cluster with KS defined as
CREATE KEYSPACE someks WITH REPLICATION = { 'class' :
'org.apache.cassandra.locator.NetworkTopologyStrategy', 'some-dc': '3' } AND
DURABLE_WRITES = true;
next I read with Pyhton (cassandra-driver 3.11) from Cassandra 3.11.3 and get
error
Er
Hi Vlad,
Maybe the consistency level has been set manually in CQLSH. Did you try
checking your consistency level and set it back to normal? (Just a thought,
Not sure!!)
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 2:00 PM Vlad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have three nodes cluster with KS defined as
>
> *CREATE KEYSPACE some
Hi,
I do reads in my own Python code, how cqlsh can affect it?
On Wednesday, May 22, 2019 12:02 PM, Chakravarthi Manepalli
wrote:
Hi Vlad,
Maybe the consistency level has been set manually in CQLSH. Did you try
checking your consistency level and set it back to normal? (Just a thought,
In a lot of cases, the issue is with the data model.
Can you describe the table?
Can you provide the query you use to retrieve the data?
What's the load on your cluster?
Are there lots of tombstones?
You can set the consistency level to ONE, just to check if you get
responses. Although normally I
That's the issue - I do not use consistency ALL. I set QUORUM or ONE but it
still performs with ALL.
On Wednesday, May 22, 2019 12:42 PM, shalom sagges
wrote:
In a lot of cases, the issue is with the data model.
Can you describe the table?
Can you provide the query you use to retrieve
Hello everyone,
We have an 8 node C* cluster with large volume of unbalanced data. Usual
per-partition selects work somewhat fine, and are processed by limited
number of nodes, but if user issues SELECT WHERE IN () ALLOW FILTERING,
such command stalls all 8 nodes to halt and unresponsiveness to ex
Hi Vsevolod,
1) Why such behavior? I thought any given SELECT request is handled by a
limited subset of C* nodes and not by all of them, as per connection
consistency/table replication settings, in case.
When you run a query with allow filtering, Cassandra doesn't know where the
data is located, s
Hi,
FYI: I created a bug ticket since I think the behavior is just not right.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15138
Thanks,
Hiro
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:58 AM Hiroyuki Yamada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should I post a bug ?
> It doesn't seem to be an expected behavior,
> so I think it
Hi,
"When you run a query with allow filtering, Cassandra doesn't know where
the data is located, so it has to go node by node, searching for the
requested data."
a) Interesting... But only in case you do not provide partitioning key
right? (so IN() is for partitioning key?)
b) Still does
Hello!
I am trying to understand the consistency level (not serial consistency)
required for LWTs. Basically what I am trying to understand is that if a
consistency level of ONE is enough for a LWT write operation if I do my
read with a consistency level of SERIAL?
It would seem so based on what
10 matches
Mail list logo