Hi Everyone,
I want to start working with Prepared Statements.
I've read
https://docs.datastax.com/en/developer/java-driver/3.1/manual/statements/prepared/
and
just wanted to know if there are any other considerations I need to take
into account when deciding to use Prepared Statements.
Thanks!
Hello,
Current latest Cassandra version (3.11.0, possibly also 3.0.12+) has a race
condition that causes Cassandra to create broken sstables (stats file in
sstables to be precise).
Bug described here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13752
This change might be causing it (but not
Hi,
We're using Cassandra 3.0.9. I've found some warnings that Cassandra
should not be deployed using OpenJDK, but all the information on that
is at least 2 years old.
Is this still something to watch out for? Or is the warning just legacy?
Thanks,
Myrle Krantz
Solution Architect, Kuelap, Inc.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're using Cassandra 3.0.9. I've found some warnings that Cassandra
> should not be deployed using OpenJDK, but all the information on that
> is at least 2 years old.
>
> Is this still something to watch out for? Or is the warning
OpenJDK is fine.
Hi,
I am getting an error connecting to cqlsh. I am getting the following
error.
Connection error: ('Unable to connect to any servers', {'127.0.0.1':
error(111, "Tried connecting to [('127.0.0.1', 9042)]. Last error:
Connection refused")})
I change the Cassandra.yaml file setting for rpc_address
Is this a local install? If so you can set your rpc_address to 127.0.0.1. The
rpc_address are the IP addresses that will be allowed to make connections to
Cassandra.
I suspect the problem is that you have set your RPC address to your IP address
with is different from 127.0.0.1. cqlsh by defau
We're using 3.0.12+ for a few months and haven't seen the issue like
that. Do we know what could trigger the problem? Or is 3.0.x really
impacted?
Thanks,
Jay
On 8/28/17 6:02 AM, Hannu Kröger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Current latest Cassandra version (3.11.0, possibly also 3.0.12+) has a race
> condit
For what it's worth, I don't think this impacts 3.0 without adding some other
code change (the reporter of the bug on 3.0 had added custom metrics that
exposed a concurrency issue).
We're looking at it on 3.11. I think 13038 made it far more likely to occur,
but I think it could have happened p
I shouldn't actually say I don't think it can happen on 3.0 - I haven't seen
this happen on 3.0 without some other code change to enable it, but like I
said, we're still investigating.
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Aug 28, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, I don't think thi
10 matches
Mail list logo