Hi Vasu,
I'm not sure Cassandra can pro, but actually all volume of data inserted in on
dc should go to other DC. You can check network traffic with any available
tools.
Best regards, Vladimir Yudovin,
Winguzone - Cloud Cassandra Hosting
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:18:17 -0400 vasu
Hi,
Cassandra uses standard Java API for SSL security, so in general Java options
are available.
Best regards, Vladimir Yudovin,
Winguzone - Cloud Cassandra Hosting
On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 10:13:27 -0400 Victor Ashik
wrote
Hello,
Is it po
Hi,
Do your disks have the same size? AFAK Cassandra distributes data with
proportion to disk size, i.e. keeps the same percent of busy space.
Best regards, Vladimir Yudovin,
Winguzone - Cloud Cassandra Hosting
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:15:48 -0400 Xihui He
wro
Hi,
Currently, I am working on data modeling for Video Company in which we have
different types of users as well as different user functionality.
But currently, my concern is about Search video module based on different
fields.
Query patterns are as below:-
1) Select video by actor.
2) select vid
Hi Vladimir,
The disks size are all the same, 1.8T as show in df, and only used by
cassandra.
It seems to me that maybe the compacted lagetst file is on data01 which
uses 1.1T.
Thanks,
Xihui
On 11 June 2017 at 17:26, Vladimir Yudovin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do your disks have the same size? AFAK Cass
That's the cause of the imbalance -- an excessively large sstable which
suggests to me that at some point you performed a manual major compaction
with nodetool compact.
If the table is using STCS, there won't be other compaction partners in the
near future so you split the sstable manually with ss
>
> *Given my use case is cassandra the best suited one or is there any other
> database which suits my requirement better?*
Probably not the right forum for that question. It's like walking into a
Ford dealership and asking if the Mustang is the best car for you. 😄
In any case, you would choose
No, I didn't set it (left it at default value)
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:18 AM, ZAIDI, ASAD A wrote:
> Did you make sure auto_bootstrap property is indeed set to [true] when
> you added the node?
>
>
>
> *From:* Junaid Nasir [mailto:jna...@an10.io]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 05, 2017 6:29 AM
> *To:*
You could put the tenant as a column that is part of the clustering key. That
avoids large partitions.
On 12 Jun 2017, at 07:14, Erick Ramirez wrote:
>> Given my use case is cassandra the best suited one or is there any other
>> database which suits my requirement better?
>
> Probably not th