Simply don't use G1 GC, it will not be better on Cassandra than CMS, it could
be worse.
Best regards / Pagarbiai
Viktor Jevdokimov
Senior Developer
Email: viktor.jevdoki...@adform.com
Phone: +370 5 212 3063
Fax: +370 5 261 0453
J. Jasinskio 16C,
LT-03163 Vilnius,
Lithuania
Disclaimer: The
Forgot to ask, what do you want to achieve by changing default GC settings?
-Original Message-
From: Viktor Jevdokimov [mailto:viktor.jevdoki...@adform.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:18 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: RE: Cassandra mad GC
Simply don't use G1 GC, it
I set G1 because GS started to work wrong(dropped messages) with standard GC
settings.
In my opinion, Cassandra started to work more stable with G1 (it's getting
less count of timeouts now) but it's not ideally yet.
I just want cassandra to works fine.
--
View this message in context:
http://c
Hi,
by the way, some of the issues are summarised here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6586 and here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6587.
regards,
ondrej cernos
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Ondřej Černoš wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the answer and sorry
It is not a good idea to change settings without identifying the root
cause. Chances are what you did masked the problem a bit for you, but the
problem is still there, isn't it?
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Dimetrio wrote:
> I set G1 because GS started to work wrong(dropped messages) with s
Hi,
I would like to get some answer for the following scenario.
Lets say we have a two nodes cluster(node_a and node_b) with the replication
factor of 2. It means both nodes(node_a and node_b) will have the same amount
of data replicated. If one node(node_b) goes down and comes back. Is there
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Logendran, Dharsan (Dharsan) <
dharsan.logend...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Lets say we have a two nodes cluster(node_a and node_b) with the
> replication factor of 2. It means both nodes(node_a and node_b) will have
> the same amount of data replicated. If on
Thanks Rob,
It was quick.
Dharsan
From: Robert Coli [mailto:rc...@eventbrite.com]
Sent: January-15-14 2:44 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about out of sync
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Logendran, Dharsan (Dharsan)
mailto:dharsan.logend...@alcatel-lucent.com>>
wro
Sorry for the odd subject but something is wrong with our cassandra ring.
We have a 9 node ring as below.
N1 - UP/NORMAL
N2 - UP/NORMAL
N3 - UP/NORMAL
N4 - UP/NORMAL
N5 - UP/NORMAL
N6 - UP/NORMAL
N7 - UP/NORMAL
N8 - UP/NORMAL
N9 - UP/NORMAL
Using random partitioner and simple snitch. Cassandra 1.
what is the RF? What does nodetool ring show?
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Narendra Sharma
wrote:
> Sorry for the odd subject but something is wrong with our cassandra ring.
> We have a 9 node ring as below.
>
> N1 - UP/NORMAL
> N2 - UP/NORMAL
> N3 - UP/NORMAL
> N4 - UP/NORMAL
> N5 - UP/NORM
RF=3.
On Jan 15, 2014 1:18 PM, "Andrey Ilinykh" wrote:
> what is the RF? What does nodetool ring show?
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Narendra Sharma <
> narendra.sha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the odd subject but something is wrong with our cassandra ring.
>> We have a 9 node ri
11 matches
Mail list logo
