Ok, thanks for clearing that up.
On 23 Nov 2012 07:18, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote:
> Currently, I'm not sure you can really reduce those dependencies. But we
> do plan on reducing that ultimately. Basically the reason we have anything
> thrift related in there is that so far we depends on the full
Aaron,
Nodetool reports: 1.1.6-dse-p1
What about inserted data using Hadoop? Will the secondary index execute
concurrently or will this also be single threaded (on the same machine I mean)?
From: aaron morton [mailto:aa...@thelastpickle.com]
Sent: November-22-12 8:04 PM
To: user@cassandra.apach
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Darvin Denmian
wrote:
> But right now I need to increased the level of data redundancy ... and
> to accomplish that I'll configure 3
> new Cassandra nodes in other Data Center.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3483
=Rob
--
=Robert Coli
AIM>ALK
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Thomas Stets wrote:
> Is there any advantage in using a different placement strategy, consigering
> that each node has all of the data anyway?
No. In your case there is no advantage to NetworkTopologyStrategy. It
is somewhat odd that you have one logical cluster i
