Yiming, I am using 2 CF's. Performance wise this should not be an issue. I
use it for small files data store. My 2 CF's are:
FilesMeta
FilesData
2012/2/5 Yiming Sun
> Interesting idea, Jim. Is there a reason you don't you use
> "metadata:{accountId}" instead? For performance reasons?
>
>
> On
Thanks R.V.!! We are also dealing with many small files, so this sounds
really promising.
-- Y.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:59 AM, R. Verlangen wrote:
> Yiming, I am using 2 CF's. Performance wise this should not be an issue. I
> use it for small files data store. My 2 CF's are:
>
> FilesMeta
> Fi
Close enough for me :)
A
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 3/02/2012, at 8:39 PM, R. Verlangen wrote:
> Well, it seems it's balancing itself, 24 hours later the ring looks like this:
>
> ***.89datacenter1 rack1 Up Norma
Not sure I understand the question. Do you have an example where a CF is not
getting compacted ?
The compaction tasks will be processed in the order they are submitted. If you
have concurrent_compactors > 1 then the thread pool for compactions (excluding
validation compactions) will be able to
I'm not thinking about counters specifically here, and assuming you are sending
batch mutations of the same size…
The mutations (inserts, counter increments) for a row are turned into a single
task server side, and are then processed in a serial fashion. If you send a
mutation for 2 rows it wi
Does it work with iptables disabled?
You could add log to your firewall rules to see if firewall is
dropping the packets.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Roshan wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have 2 node Cassandra cluster and each linux box configured with a
> firewall. The ports 7000, 7199 and 9160 are open
Hi,
What is the best way to know the cluster status via php?
Currently we are trying to connect to individual cassandra instance with a
specified timeout and if it fails we report the node to be down.
But this test remains faulty. What are the other ways to test availability
of nodes in cassandr
