I thought currently no one is maintaining supercolumns related code,
and also it not quite efficient.
yes. but they have nice features. you can do slices without need to use
orderedpartitioner
Sounds like it could be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3123 ? (which was
fixed in 0.8.5).
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Jeremy Hanna
wrote:
> We're using 0.8.4 in our cluster and two nodes needed rebuilding. When
> building and streaming data to the nodes, there were multipl
It sounds like that's just a message in compactionstats that's a no-op. This
is reporting for about an hour that it's building a secondary index on a
specific column family. Not sure if that's the same thing. I see in the data
directory definitely new files written with the old index names we
The problem was fixed by _decreasing_ heap size and applying changes
on the least loaded node.
Tyler, where saved caches are stored? /var/lib/cassandra/saved_caches?
Would it help relieving heap load?
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Tyler Hobbs wrote:
> You could also delete any saved caches, wh
> We set row cache too high, 1 or so and now all our 6 nodes fail
> with OOM. I believe that high row cache causes OOMs.
If you get into a fallen-and-cant-get-up scenario like this, I suggest
a rolling restart of nodes, and on each node:
(1) shut it down
(2) removed saved caches
(3) start it
help?
On 10/11/2011 19:34, Guy Incognito wrote:
hi,
i've been looking at the model below from Ed Anuff's presentation at
Cassandra CF
(http://www.slideshare.net/edanuff/indexing-in-cassandra). Couple of
questions:
1) Isn't there still the chance that two concurrent updates may end up
wit
1) The index updates should be eventually consistent. This does mean
that you can get a transient false-positive on your search results.
If this doesn't work for you, then you either need to use ZK or some
other locking solution or do "read repair" by making sure that the row
you retrieve contains
Is there a way to configure the serializers to use while showing up the
stored data ??
Thanks
Aklin
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aditya Narayan wrote:
> Yes that would be pretty nice feature to see!
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Ertio Lew wrote:
>
>> Thanks so much SebWajam fo
