@Naren Thanks for the reply.
I noticed that EmbeddedCassandraService is now part of the Cassandra
distribution. The source code is changed compared to what Ran had posted at
http://prettyprint.me/2010/02/14/running-cassandra-as-an-embedded-service/
I tried to use EmbeddedCassandraService with thi
@Jason Thanks, I found the Pelops EmbeddedCassandraServer implementation and
am giving it a try.
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Starting-the-Cassandra-server-from-Java-without-command-line-tp6273826p6278564.html
Sent from the cas
If you are reading and writing at quorum, then what you are seeing
shouldn't happen. You shouldn't be able to read N+1 until N+1 has
been committed to a quorum of servers. At this point you should not
be able to read N anymore, since there is no quorum that contains N.
Dan - I think you are righ
Any one have solution for this problem ?
On 04/13/2011 05:20 PM, Ali Ahsan wrote:
I am not running any firewall this physical machine not EC2,I can
telnet to port 8080
telnet 127.0.0.1 8080
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1).
Escape character is '^]'.
-
2011/4/16 Roni :
> I have a 0.6.4 Cassandra cluster of two nodes in full replica (replica
> factor 2). I wants to add two more nodes and balance the cluster (replica
> factor 2).
>
> I want all of them to be seed's.
>
>
>
> What should be the simple steps:
>
> 1. add the "true" to all the nodes or
James,
Would you mind sharing your reader process code as well?
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:14 PM, James Cipar wrote:
> I've been experimenting with the consistency model of Cassandra, and I
> found something that seems a bit unexpected. In my experiment, I have 2
> processes, a reader and a wri
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/JmxGotchas
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ali Ahsan wrote:
> Any one have solution for this problem ?
>
>
>
> On 04/13/2011 05:20 PM, Ali Ahsan wrote:
>
>> I am not running any firewall this physical machine not EC2,I can telnet
>> to port 8080
>>
>>
>> telnet
Can you run the same request as a get_slice naming the column in the
SlicePredicate and see what comes back ?
Can you reproduce the fault with logging set at DEBUG and send the logs ?
Also, whats the compare function like for your custom type ?
Cheers
Aaron
On 16 Apr 2011, at 07:34, Abraham
There is a known issue for concurrent schema migrations
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1391
Once they diverge the I think you can delete the schema by removing the
necessary system files and leaving the data files in place, then re-creating
the files.
And yes, you should not
Am assuming you are not getting a hot spot in the ring using the OPP.
When running 0.7.4 with reduced concurrent reads if you see the read stage
backing up using nodetool tpstats and the output from iostats shows that the IO
system is not stressed then you should return the concurrent reads to
I don't think I got correct answer to my original post. Can someone please
help?
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Two-versions-of-schema-tp6277365p6280070.html
Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive a
Here it is. There is some setup code and global variable definitions that I
left out of the previous code, but they are pretty similar to the setup code
here.
import pycassa
import random
import time
consistency_level = pycassa.cassandra.ttypes.ConsistencyLevel.QUORUM
durat
Here's what's probably happening:
I'm assuming RF=3 and QUORUM writes/reads here. I'll call the replicas A,
B, and C.
1. Writer process writes sequence number 1 and everything works fine. A,
B, and C all have sequence number 1.
2. Writer process writes sequence number 2. Replica A writes suc
Tyler, your answer seems to contradict this email by Jonathan Ellis
[1]. In it Jonathan says,
"The important guarantee this gives you is that once one quorum read
sees the new value, all others will too. You can't see the newest
version, then see an older version on a subsequent write [sic, I
a
Tyler is correct, because Cassandra doesn't wait until repair writes
are acked before the answer is returned. This is something we can fix.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Sean Bridges wrote:
> Tyler, your answer seems to contradict this email by Jonathan Ellis
> [1]. In it Jonathan says,
>
>
16 matches
Mail list logo