Re: what is more important (RAM vs Cores)

2012-10-12 Thread B. Todd Burruss
i would not worry as much about the single machine specs. find the sweet spot on price for CPU and RAM and by that, then scale horizontal to meet your demand. but .. if i was pressed for a general statement -choose RAM over CPU On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Serge Fonville wrote: > It seems y

Re: what is more important (RAM vs Cores)

2012-10-12 Thread Serge Fonville
It seems you RAM/core ratio is different between your options. So if those two are your only options I'd suggest the 16GB option. Still, the other things * Concurrency * Fit in ram * IO Are very relevant. HTH Kind regards/met vriendelijke groet, Serge Fonville http://www.sergefonville.nl Co

RE: what is more important (RAM vs Cores)

2012-10-12 Thread Romain HARDOUIN
Also, take into account i/o since they are often a limiting factor.

RE: what is more important (RAM vs Cores)

2012-10-12 Thread Tim Wintle
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 10:20 +, Viktor Jevdokimov wrote: > IMO, in most cases you'll be limited by the RAM first. +1 - I've seen our 8-core boxes limited by RAM and inter-rack networking, but not by CPU (yet). Tim

RE: what is more important (RAM vs Cores)

2012-10-12 Thread Viktor Jevdokimov
n error, please contact the sender immediately and irrevocably delete this message and any copies.> -Original Message- > From: Hagos, A.S. [mailto:a.s.ha...@tue.nl] > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 12:17 > To: user@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: RE: what is more important (RA

RE: what is more important (RAM vs Cores)

2012-10-12 Thread Hagos, A.S.
important (RAM vs Cores) Hi, Sure it depends... but IMHO 6 GB is suboptimal for big data because it means 1,5 GB or 2 GB for Cassandra. Maybe you could elaborate your use case. You really want a one node cluster ? cheers, Romain wang liang a écrit sur 12/10/2012 10:36:15 : > Hi, Hagos, > >

Re: what is more important (RAM vs Cores)

2012-10-12 Thread Romain HARDOUIN
Hi, Sure it depends... but IMHO 6 GB is suboptimal for big data because it means 1,5 GB or 2 GB for Cassandra. Maybe you could elaborate your use case. You really want a one node cluster ? cheers, Romain wang liang a écrit sur 12/10/2012 10:36:15 : > Hi, Hagos, > > I think it depends on yo

Re: what is more important (RAM vs Cores)

2012-10-12 Thread wang liang
Hi, Hagos, I think it depends on your business case. Big RAM reduce latency and improve responsibility, High number of cores increase concurrency of your app. thanks. On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Hagos, A.S. wrote: > Hi All, > For of my projects I want to buy a machine to host Casssandra da

what is more important (RAM vs Cores)

2012-10-12 Thread Hagos, A.S.
Hi All, For of my projects I want to buy a machine to host Casssandra database. The options I am offered are machines with 16GB RAM with Quad-Core processor and 6GB RAM with Hexa-Core processor. Which one do you recommend, big RAM or high number of cores? greetings Ambes