; repair to make the replaced node consistent again, since it missed ongoing
>> writes during bootstrapping.but for a great cluster,repair is a painful
>> process.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Peng Xiao
>>
>>
>>
>> ------ 原始邮件 ------
>
人:* "Anthony Grasso";
> *发送时间:* 2018年3月22日(星期四) 晚上7:13
> *收件人:* "user";
> *主题:* Re: replace dead node vs remove node
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> Depending on the hardware failure you can do one of two things:
>
> 1. If the disks are intact and uncorrupted yo
ain, since it missed ongoing
>> writes during bootstrapping.but for a great cluster,repair is a painful
>> process.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Peng Xiao
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 原始邮件 --
>> *发件人:* "Anthony Grasso";
>> *发送时间:* 201
> process.
>
> Thanks,
> Peng Xiao
>
>
>
> -- 原始邮件 --
> *发件人:* "Anthony Grasso";
> *发送时间:* 2018年3月22日(星期四) 晚上7:13
> *收件人:* "user";
> *主题:* Re: replace dead node vs remove node
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> Depending on the hardware f
apping.but for a great cluster,repair is a painful
> process.
>
> Thanks,
> Peng Xiao
>
>
>
> -- 原始邮件 --
> 发件人: "Anthony Grasso";
> 发送时间: 2018年3月22日(星期四) 晚上7:13
> 收件人: "user";
> 主题: Re: replace dead node vs
painful process.
Thanks,
Peng Xiao
-- --
??: "Anthony Grasso";
: 2018??3??22??(??) 7:13
??: "user";
????: Re: replace dead node vs remove node
Hi Peng,
Depending on the hardware failure you can do one of
Hi Peng,
Depending on the hardware failure you can do one of two things:
1. If the disks are intact and uncorrupted you could just use the disks
with the current data on them in the new node. Even if the IP address
changes for the new node that is fine. In that case all you need to do is
run repa
Dear All,
when one node failure with hardware errors,it will be in DN status in the
cluster.Then if we are not able to handle this error in three hours(max hints
window),we will loss data,right?we have to run repair to keep the consistency.
And as per
https://blog.alteroot.org/articles/2014-03
