Re: large Rows Vs multinodes ring

2012-06-18 Thread Cyril Auburtin
ok so it would be better to cut those large rows, inserting rows with row+ monthId, or row+week, and then all the corresponding columns inside, it will drastically reduce rows size, but to retrieve results overlapping between weeks or month, I have to to a multiget, less simple than a get thx for

Re: large Rows Vs multinodes ring

2012-06-18 Thread aaron morton
It's not an exact science. Some general guidelines though: * A row normally represents an entity * Rows wider than the thrift_max_message_length_in_mb (16MB) cannot be retrieved in a single call * Wide rows (in the 10's of MB) become can make repair do more work than is needed. * Rows wider than

large Rows Vs multinodes ring

2012-06-18 Thread Cyril Auburtin
In what extent, having possibly large rows, (many columns (sorted as timeststamp, or geohash or ...) will be nefast for a muli-node ring. I guess a row can be read/write just on one node, if yes it's more likely to fail, (than having one row per timestamp ..) thanks for explanations