Re: is Cassandra-494 fixed.

2011-09-27 Thread Jonathan Ellis
More like "distant future if ever." On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Boris Yen wrote: > Does "later" mean it is going to be supported soon, like at version 1.x? > Regards > Boris > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> >> The key here is "Resolution: Later" >> >> On Tue, Sep

Re: is Cassandra-494 fixed.

2011-09-27 Thread Boris Yen
Does "later" mean it is going to be supported soon, like at version 1.x? Regards Boris On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > The key here is "Resolution: Later" > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Boris Yen wrote: > > Hi, > > I was wondering if this ticket has been taken ca

Re: is Cassandra-494 fixed.

2011-09-27 Thread Jonathan Ellis
The key here is "Resolution: Later" On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Boris Yen wrote: > Hi, > I was wondering if this ticket has been taken care of. It is marked as > resolved, but I saw "None" for the "fix version". Can anyone shed some > lights on this? > Regards > Boris -- Jonathan Ellis P

Re: is Cassandra-494 fixed.

2011-09-27 Thread aaron morton
Sorry, you cannot use a slice range for a delete. Cheers - Aaron Morton Freelance Cassandra Developer @aaronmorton http://www.thelastpickle.com On 27/09/2011, at 9:48 PM, Boris Yen wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if this ticket has been taken care of. It is marked as > resol

is Cassandra-494 fixed.

2011-09-27 Thread Boris Yen
Hi, I was wondering if this ticket has been taken care of. It is marked as resolved, but I saw "None" for the "fix version". Can anyone shed some lights on this? Regards Boris