2) It would be better with an example, but again - by storing more
>>>>than you would in an sql-schema, would you still need to compute a
>>>>table
>>>>C? Is it possible to have just the CF A, and have all data in that CF?
>>>>Would it be possible
sier to have the rules applied on the client, so
>>>that you don't have to change the schema/recalculate CF C?
>>>
>>> .vegard,
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From:
>>> user@cassandra.apache.org
>>>
>>&g
mpute a table
>>C? Is it possible to have just the CF A, and have all data in that CF?
>>Would it be possible/easier to have the rules applied on the client, so
>>that you don't have to change the schema/recalculate CF C?
>>
>> .vegard,
>>
>> -----
have all data in that CF? Would it be
> possible/easier to have the rules applied on the client, so that you don't
> have to change the schema/recalculate CF C?
>
> .vegard,
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> user@cassandra.apache.org
>
> To:
>
>
Hi,
I am no expert, but a couple of suggestions:1) Remember that writes
are very fast i Cassandra, so don't be afraid to store more
information than you would in an Sql-ish server. 2) It would be
better with an example, but again - by storing more than you would in
an sql-schema, would you still
Hi Experts,
We have tables (a.k.a. column family) A and B. The row of the table is
simply a key value pair. Table A and B are written by clients all the
time. We need to transform the row key of table A and B according to
a set of rules, join these two tables and save the results to table C
for r
