Thanks for the quick response. TWCS is used.
> On 12 Jan 2018, at 11:38 AM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>
> Probably not in any measurable way.
>
> --
> Jeff Jirsa
>
>
>> On Jan 11, 2018, at 6:16 PM, Eunsu Kim wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> We are collecting monitoring data in excess of 100K TPS
Probably not in any measurable way.
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 6:16 PM, Eunsu Kim wrote:
>
> Hi everyone
>
> We are collecting monitoring data in excess of 100K TPS in Cassandra.
>
> All data is time series data and must have a TTL.
>
> Currently we have set default_time_to_liv
No. Nothing measurable. In fact it should be beneficial if paired with TWCS
On 12 Jan. 2018 1:17 pm, "Eunsu Kim" wrote:
Hi everyone
We are collecting monitoring data in excess of 100K TPS in Cassandra.
All data is time series data and must have a TTL.
Currently we have set default_time_to_liv
Hi everyone
We are collecting monitoring data in excess of 100K TPS in Cassandra.
All data is time series data and must have a TTL.
Currently we have set default_time_to_live on the table.
Does this have a negative impact on Cassandra throughput performance?
Thank you in advance.
--