:
> As to why I think it's cluster-wide, here's what the documentation says:
>
>
> https://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/1.2/cassandra/configuration/configCassandra_yaml_r.html
> compaction_throughput_mb_per_sec
> <https://docs.datastax.com/en/cassan
Will do. I searched the doc for additional usage of the term "system"
commitlog_segment_size_in_mb refers to "every table in the system"
concurrent_writes talks about CPU cores "in your system"
That's it for "system" other than the compaction_thro
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Ken Hancock wrote:
> As to why I think it's cluster-wide, here's what the documentation says:
>
Do you see "system" used in place of "cluster" anywhere else in the docs?
I think you are correct that the docs should standardize on "system"
instead of "node", becau
As to why I think it's cluster-wide, here's what the documentation says:
https://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/1.2/cassandra/configuration/configCassandra_yaml_r.html
compaction_throughput_mb_per_sec
<https://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/1.2/cassandra/configuration/configCassandr
ndra.apache.org"
Subject: compaction_throughput_mb_per_sec
I was surprised the other day to discover that this was a cluster-wide setting.
Why does that make sense?
In a heterogeneous cassandra deployment, say I have some old servers running
spinning disks and I'm bringing on more n
>
>> Also, as I increase my node count, I technically also have to increase my
>> compaction_throughput which would require a rolling restart across the
>> cluster.
>>
>>
> You can set compaction throughput on each node dynamically via nodetool
> setcompactionthroughput.
>
>
>
Also, the IOPS genera
>
>
> Also, as I increase my node count, I technically also have to increase my
> compaction_throughput which would require a rolling restart across the
> cluster.
>
>
You can set compaction throughput on each node dynamically via nodetool
setcompactionthroughput.
--
-
Nate McCal
This is set in the cassandra.yaml on each node independently; it doesn't
have to be same cluster-wide.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Ken Hancock wrote:
> I was surprised the other day to discover that this was a cluster-wide
> setting. Why does that make sense?
>
> In a heterogeneous cassand
I was surprised the other day to discover that this was a cluster-wide
setting. Why does that make sense?
In a heterogeneous cassandra deployment, say I have some old servers
running spinning disks and I'm bringing on more nodes that perhaps utilize
SSD. I want to have different compaction thro
