It may make sense to use a secondary index for the counts. You could store the
counts in both places and use a batch mutation to update them. It does not give
you a transaction guarantee, but it will mean you still make one request to
Cassandra.
e.g.
{
:
:
}
The secondar
Hi Colin,
> From: Colin Vipurs [mailto:zodiac...@gmail.com]
[...]
> I've got some data that I'm doing counts on, stored in a CF as:
>
> {
> :
> :
>
> }
[...]
> {
> : PLACEHOLDER
> : PLACEHOLDER
> }
>
> would be a better way of storing the data? Does anyone know t
I've got some data that I'm doing counts on, stored in a CF as:
{
:
:
}
With updates happening as an insert on the specific column.
I need to extract the top X values by count and I was wondering if
storing this as:
{
: PLACEHOLDER
: PLACEHOLDER
}
would be a bett
