yes, the extra io + cpu caused by decomission will affect reads (and
writes, to a lesser degree)
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Maxim Kramarenko
wrote:
> It reports, that node 3 transfer data to node 1. As I remember, node 2
> doesn't send or receive data.
>
> BTW, after a few hrs (probably, a
It reports, that node 3 transfer data to node 1. As I remember, node 2
doesn't send or receive data.
BTW, after a few hrs (probably, after decomission finished), node 2
become work again, without restart. Can decommission of node 3 affect
reading ?
On 20.05.2010 18:51, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
What does JMX report as described in
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Streaming ?
2010/5/19 Maxim Kramarenko :
> Hello!
>
> I have 3 node cluster: node1, node2, node3. Replication factor = 2.
> I run decommission on node3 and it's in progress, moving data to node1
>
> Ring on all nodes show all 3
Hello!
I have 3 node cluster: node1, node2, node3. Replication factor = 2.
I run decommission on node3 and it's in progress, moving data to node1
Ring on all nodes show all 3 nodes up, no problems (but node 1 response
with 3-5 sec delay).
I tried to execute a few "get" statements using cli, l
