mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
> mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>, Wei Zhu <
> wz1...@yahoo.com<mailto:wz1...@yahoo.com>>
> > Date: Friday, March 8, 2013 11:11 AM
> > To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" <
&
t;user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
> mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>, Wei Zhu
> mailto:wz1...@yahoo.com>>
> Date: Friday, March 8, 2013 11:11 AM
> To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
&g
AM
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Size Tiered -> Leveled Compaction
I have the same wonder.
We started with the default 5M and the compaction after repair takes too long
on 200G node, so we
utiful on paper.
Thanks.
-Wei
From: Alain RODRIGUEZ
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Cc: Wei Zhu
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 1:25 AM
Subject: Re: Size Tiered -> Leveled Compaction
I'm still wondering about how to chose the size of the sstable under LCS.
Defaul is 5
t for
>> fun, you can look at a file called $CFName.json in your data directory and
>> it tells you the SSTable distribution among different levels.
>>
>> -Wei
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Charles Brophy
>> *To:* user@cassandra.apac
tion as well. If anybody here has the wisdom to answer
> them it would be of wonderful help.
>
> Thanks
> Charles
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Mike wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm investigating the transition of some of our column families from Size
> Tiere
<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Size Tiered -> Leveled Compaction
"After running a major compaction, automatic minor compactions are no longer
triggered,"
... Because of the size difference between the big sstable ge
:user@cassandra.apache.org>" <
> user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
> Date: Monday, February 25, 2013 7:15 AM
> To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" <
> user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@
dra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org><mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>>
Subject: Re: Size Tiered -> Leveled Compaction
Aaron,
Thanks for the response. I think I speak for many Cassa
SANDRA-4644?focusedCommentId=13456137&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13456137
>
> Cheers
>
> -
> Aaron Morton
> Freelance Cassandra Developer
> New Zealand
>
> @aaronmorton
> http://www.thelastpickle.com&
"user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Date: Sunday, February 24, 2013 7:45 PM
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Size Tiered -> Le
mment-tabpanel#comment-13456137
>
> Cheers
>
> -
> Aaron Morton
> Freelance Cassandra Developer
> New Zealand
>
> @aaronmorton
> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>
> On 23/02/2013, at 6:56 AM, Mike wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
6137
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Cassandra Developer
New Zealand
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 23/02/2013, at 6:56 AM, Mike wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Still doing research before we potentially move one of our column families
> from Size Tiered->Leve
Hello,
Still doing research before we potentially move one of our column
families from Size Tiered->Leveled compaction this weekend. I was doing
some research around some of the bugs that were filed against leveled
compaction in Cassandra and I found this:
https://issues.apache.org/j
mance.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike"
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:50:40 AM
Subject: Re: Size Tiered -> Leveled Compaction
Hello Wei,
First thanks for this response.
Out of curiosity, what SSTable size did you choose for your useca
tion among different levels.
-Wei
*From:* Charles Brophy
*To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
*Sent:* Thursday, February 14, 2013 8:29 AM
*Subject:* Re: Size Tiered -> Leveled Compaction
I second these questions: we've been looking into changing some of our
;>
*To:* user@cassandra.apache.org <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
*Sent:* Thursday, February 14, 2013 8:29 AM
*Subject:* Re: Size Tiered -> Leveled Compaction
I second these questions: we've been looking into changing some of
our CFs to use leveled compaction as well. If anybod
e the SSTable
> size.
>
> By the way, there is no concept of Major compaction for LCS. Just for fun,
> you can look at a file called $CFName.json in your data directory and it
> tells you the SSTable distribution among different levels.
>
> -Wei
>
> From: Charl
ata directory and it tells you
the SSTable distribution among different levels.
-Wei
From: Charles Brophy
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: Size Tiered -> Leveled Compaction
I second these questions: we
ting the transition of some of our column families from Size
> Tiered -> Leveled Compaction. I believe we have some high-read-load column
> families that would benefit tremendously.
>
> I've stood up a test DB Node to investigate the transition. I
> successfully alter the
Hello,
I'm investigating the transition of some of our column families from
Size Tiered -> Leveled Compaction. I believe we have some
high-read-load column families that would benefit tremendously.
I've stood up a test DB Node to investigate the transition. I
successfully alt
21 matches
Mail list logo
