Thanks Paulo for sharing the JIRA !! I have added my comments there.
"It is not advisable to remain with a down node for a long time without
replacing it (with risk of not being able to achieve consistency if another
node goes down)."
I am referring to a generic scenario where a cluster may affor
Thanks Paulo for sharing the JIRA !! I have added my comments there.
"It is not advisable to remain with a down node for a long time without
replacing it (with risk of not being able to achieve consistency if another
node goes down)."
I am referring to a generic scenario where a cluster may affor
Hello Anuj,
Repairing a range with down replicas may be valid if there is still QUORUM
up replicas and using at least QUORUM for writes. My understanding is that
it was disabled as default behavior on CASSANDRA-2290 to avoid
misuse/confusion, and its not advisable to remain with a down node for a
Hi
We are on 2.0.14,RF=3 in a 3 node cluster. We use repair -pr . Recently, we
observed that repair -pr for all nodes fails if a node is down. Then I found
the JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/CASSANDRA-2290
where an intentional decision was taken to abort the re