Deleting the json manifest worked like a charm. After 2 days of compactions
I've got 50GB extra space! :)
Just a quick addendum, after deleting the json metadata file, I needed to
restart the node, otherwise it just reloads the file from memory.
Version: 1.2.16
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:13 PM, R
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Nate McCall wrote:
> Another option to force things - deleting the json metadata file for that
> table will cause LCS to put all SSTables in level 0 and begin recompacting
> them.
>
That's possible in versions where the level is in a JSON file, which is
versions
Another option to force things - deleting the json metadata file for that
table will cause LCS to put all SSTables in level 0 and begin recompacting
them.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Paulo Ricardo Motta Gomes <
paulo.mo...@chaordicsystems.com> wrote:
> Great idea, will try that (right now i
Great idea, will try that (right now is 10%, but being more aggressive
should hopefully work).
Cheers!
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Nate McCall wrote:
> Try turning down 'tombstone_threshold' to something like '0.05' from it's
> default of '0.2.' This will cause the SSTable to be considere
Try turning down 'tombstone_threshold' to something like '0.05' from it's
default of '0.2.' This will cause the SSTable to be considered for
tombstone only compactions more frequently (if %5 of the columns are
tombstones instead of 20%).
For a bit more info, see:
http://www.datastax.com/documentat
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Paulo Ricardo Motta Gomes <
paulo.mo...@chaordicsystems.com> wrote:
> What is the solution here? The good old "change to STCS and then back to
> LCS", or is there something less brute force?
>
In theory you could use user defined compaction via JMX, but I'd proba
Hey folks,
After adding more nodes and moving tokens of "old" nodes to rebalance the
ring, I noticed that the "old" nodes had significant more data then the
newly bootstrapped nodes, even after cleanup.
I noticed that the old nodes had a much larger number of SSTables on LCS
CFs, and most of them
Hey,
now I got it. I'll try it this night :)
Thanks for all replies.
Regards.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Hiller, Dean wrote:
> Nodetool has a move command so you can move to a new better token. Read
> up on the documentation there. I have not used it yet myselfŠ.good idea
> to test it o
Nodetool has a move command so you can move to a new better token. Read
up on the documentation there. I have not used it yet myselfŠ.good idea
to test it on your test cluster first.
Dean
On 10/1/12 8:03 AM, "Darvin Denmian" wrote:
>as you can see there is no "Zero Token". Maybe I did somethi
; Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
> mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
> Date: Monday, October 1, 2012 6:56 AM
> To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
> mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: Rebalancing cluster
>
> Did you set up the tokens the way
> the manual says?
Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Date: Monday, October 1, 2012 6:56 AM
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Subject
Hi,
1) Yes. I'm using Random Partitioner
2) All 3 nodes in the cluster have used "auto_bootstrap" to acquire their
part of data (I really don't know if this is correct).
Regards.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Bradford Toney wrote:
> Are you using the random partitoner? Did you set up the tok
Are you using the random partitoner? Did you set up the tokens the way
the manual says?
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2012, at 7:55 AM, Darvin Denmian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently my Cassandra cluster has 3 nodes and I'm facing a very common
> problem... Rebalance the data of the cluster.
> At
13 matches
Mail list logo
