Re: need help with choosing correct tokens for ByteOrderedPartitioner

2011-11-28 Thread Piavlo
On 11/29/2011 02:51 AM, Benoit Perroud wrote: You may want to add 29991231 instead of appending. Do you mean generate keys like this md5(member_id) + mmdd instead of md5(member_id)mmdd And use the normal 128bit token range ? Hmm - this way there will obviously be overlaps of members ra

Re: need help with choosing correct tokens for ByteOrderedPartitioner

2011-11-28 Thread Benoit Perroud
You may want to add 29991231 instead of appending. Le lundi 28 novembre 2011, Piavlo a écrit : > Anyone can help with this? > > Thanks > > On 11/24/2011 11:55 AM, Piavlo wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We need help with choosing correct tokens for ByteOrderedPartitioner >> Originally the key where suppo

Re: need help with choosing correct tokens for ByteOrderedPartitioner

2011-11-28 Thread Piavlo
Anyone can help with this? Thanks On 11/24/2011 11:55 AM, Piavlo wrote: Hi, We need help with choosing correct tokens for ByteOrderedPartitioner Originally the key where supposed to be member_id-mmdd but since we need to male rage scans on same member_id and varying date ranges mmdd