Re: disappointed

2013-07-25 Thread Colin
Mysql? -- Colin +1 320 221 9531 On Jul 25, 2013, at 6:08 AM, Derek Andree wrote: > Yeah, Rob is smart. don't run crap in production. Run what others are > stable at. If you are running the latest greatest dumbest craziest in prod > then you ask for fail, and you will get just that. >

Re: disappointed

2013-07-25 Thread Derek Andree
Yeah, Rob is smart. don't run crap in production. Run what others are stable at. If you are running the latest greatest dumbest craziest in prod then you ask for fail, and you will get just that. FAIL On Jul 24, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Robert Coli wrote: > A better solution would likely involve

Re: disappointed

2013-07-24 Thread Radim Kolar
cas 2.0b2 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.txt;hb=refs/tags/2.0.0-beta2-tentative > and as a small startup time is our most valuable resource… use technology you are most familiar with.

Re: disappointed

2013-07-24 Thread Robert Coli
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Steffen Rusitschka wrote: > Same thing here... Since #5677 seems to affect a lot of users what do you > think about releasing a version 1.2.6.1? I can patch myself, yeah, but do I > want to push this into production? Hmm... > A better solution would likely involv

Re: disappointed

2013-07-24 Thread Steffen Rusitschka
Same thing here... Since #5677 seems to affect a lot of users what do you think about releasing a version 1.2.6.1? I can patch myself, yeah, but do I want to push this into production? Hmm... Am 24.07.2013 18:58, schrieb Paul Ingalls: Hey Radim, I knew that it would take a while to stabilize,

RE: disappointed

2013-07-24 Thread Christopher Wirt
veled-compaction We are read-heavy latency sensitive people Lots of TTL'ing Few writes compared to reads. From: Paul Ingalls [mailto:paulinga...@gmail.com] Sent: 24 July 2013 17:43 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: disappointed Hi Chris, Thanks for the response! Wh

Re: disappointed

2013-07-24 Thread Paul Ingalls
Hey Radim, I knew that it would take a while to stabilize, which is why I waited 1/2 a year before giving it a go. I guess I was just surprised that 6 months wasn't long enough… I'll have to look at the differences between 1.2 and 2.0. Is there a good resource for checking that? Your experi

Re: disappointed

2013-07-24 Thread Paul Ingalls
Hi Chris, Thanks for the response! What kind of challenges did you run into that kept you from using collections? I currently and running 4 physical nodes, same as I was with case 1.1.6. I'm using size tiered compaction. Would changing to level tiered with a large minimum make a big differen

Re: disappointed

2013-07-24 Thread Paul Ingalls
Same type of error, but I'm not currently using TTL's. I am, however, generating a lot of tombstones as I add elements to collections…. On Jul 24, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Fabien Rousseau wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Concerning large rows which are not compacting, I've probably managed to > reproduce you

Re: disappointed

2013-07-24 Thread Radim Kolar
From my limited experience I think Cassandra is a dangerous choice for an young limited funding/experience start-up expecting to scale fast. Its not dangerous, just do not try to be smart and follow what other big cassandra users like twitter, netflix, facebook, etc are using. If they are st

Re: disappointed

2013-07-24 Thread Fabien Rousseau
Hi Paul, Concerning large rows which are not compacting, I've probably managed to reproduce your problem. I suppose you're using collections, but also TTLs ? Anyway, I opened an issue here : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5799 Hope this helps 2013/7/24 Christopher Wirt > Hi

RE: disappointed

2013-07-24 Thread Christopher Wirt
Hi Paul, Sorry to hear you're having a low point. We ended up not using the collection features of 1.2. Instead storing a compressed string containing the map and handling client side. We only have fixed schema short rows so no experience with large row compaction. File descriptor