On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Shahab Yunus wrote:
> I admit about missing details. Sorry for that. The thing is that I was
> looking for guidance at the high-level so we can then sort out myself what
> fits our requirements and use-cases (mainly because we are at the stage
> that they could be
I admit about missing details. Sorry for that. The thing is that I was
looking for guidance at the high-level so we can then sort out myself what
fits our requirements and use-cases (mainly because we are at the stage
that they could be molded according to hardware and software
limitations/features
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Shahab Yunus wrote:
> Thanks Aaron for the reply. Yes, VMs or the nodes will be in cloud if we
> don't go the physical route.
>
> " Look how Cassandra scales and provides redundancy. "
> But how does it differ for physical machines or VMs (in cloud.) Or after
> yo
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Shahab Yunus wrote:
> But how does it differ for physical machines or VMs (in cloud.) Or after
> your first comment, are you saying that there is no difference whether we
> use physical or VMs (in cloud)?
>
Physical will always outperform virtual. He's just saying
Thanks Aaron for the reply. Yes, VMs or the nodes will be in cloud if we
don't go the physical route.
" Look how Cassandra scales and provides redundancy. "
But how does it differ for physical machines or VMs (in cloud.) Or after
your first comment, are you saying that there is no difference whet
Physical machines unless you're running your cluster in the cloud (AWS/etc).
Reason is simple: Look how Cassandra scales and provides redundancy.
Aaron Turner
http://synfin.net/ Twitter: @synfinatic
https://github.com/synfinatic/tcpreplay - Pcap editing and replay tools for
Unix & Windows
