Re: TTL and gc_grace_period

2015-06-05 Thread Tyler Hobbs
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Kévin LOVATO wrote: > Great, so is there any reason I wouldn't want to set gc_grace_seconds to 0 > on an "insert once/ttl only" column family, since it feels like the best > thing to do? Nope, setting gc_grace_seconds to 0 is just fine in your case. -- Tyler

Re: TTL and gc_grace_period

2015-06-05 Thread Kévin LOVATO
Great, so is there any reason I wouldn't want to set gc_grace_seconds to 0 on an "insert once/ttl only" column family, since it feels like the best thing to do? On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Tyler Hobbs wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Kévin LOVATO wrote: > >> >> I have a column fa

Re: TTL and gc_grace_period

2015-06-05 Thread Tyler Hobbs
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Kévin LOVATO wrote: > > I have a column family with data (metrics) that is never overwritten and > only deleted using TTLs, and I am wondering if it would be reasonable to > have a very low gc_grace_period (even 0) on that CF. I would like to do > that mainly to s