correct - I see also no other solution for this problem
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Guy Incognito wrote:
> well, no. my assumption is that he knows what the 5 itemTypes (or
> appropriate corresponding ids) are, so he can do a known 5-rowkey lookup.
> if he does not know, then agreed, my p
well, no. my assumption is that he knows what the 5 itemTypes (or
appropriate corresponding ids) are, so he can do a known 5-rowkey
lookup. if he does not know, then agreed, my proposal is not a great fit.
could do (as originally suggested)
userId -> itemType:activityId
if you want to keep
yes - but anyway in your example you need "key range quey" and that
requires OOP, right?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Guy Incognito wrote:
> multiget does not require OPP.
>
> On 27/03/2012 09:51, Maciej Miklas wrote:
>
> multiget would require Order Preserving Partitioner, and this can lea
multiget does not require OPP.
On 27/03/2012 09:51, Maciej Miklas wrote:
multiget would require Order Preserving Partitioner, and this can lead
to unbalanced ring and hot spots.
Maybe you can use secondary index on "itemtype" - is must have small
cardinality:
http://pkghosh.wordpress.com/201
@R. Verlangen:
You are suggesting to keep a single row for all activities & read all the
columns from the row & then filter, right!?
If done that way (instead of keeping it in 5 rows) then I would need to
retrieve 100s-200s of columns from single row rather than just 50 columns
if I keep in 5 rows
You can just get a slice range with as start "userId:" and no end.
2012/3/27 Maciej Miklas
> multiget would require Order Preserving Partitioner, and this can lead to
> unbalanced ring and hot spots.
>
> Maybe you can use secondary index on "itemtype" - is must have small
> cardinality:
> http:/
multiget would require Order Preserving Partitioner, and this can lead to
unbalanced ring and hot spots.
Maybe you can use secondary index on "itemtype" - is must have small
cardinality:
http://pkghosh.wordpress.com/2011/03/02/cassandra-secondary-index-patterns/
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:10 AM
without the ability to do disjoint column slices, i would probably use 5
different rows.
userId:itemType -> activityId
then it's a multiget slice of 10 items from each of your 5 rows.
On 26/03/2012 22:16, Ertio Lew wrote:
I need to store activities by each user, on 5 items types. I always
wan
