I see, now it makes perfect sense.
Thank you.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Aaron Morton wrote:
> It's not pattern matching, it's comparing / ordering the byte values. You
> are asking to return 100 keys in ascending order where the value of the key
> (after the partitioner has been applied)
It's not pattern matching, it's comparing / ordering the byte values. You are asking to return 100 keys in ascending order where the value of the key (after the partitioner has been applied) is greater than "1_265_8_12" If you want to do a seek and partial scan, you could use an end value in the li
