On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Viswanathan Ramachandran <
vish.ramachand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andrey, QUORUM consistency and no deletes makes perfect sense.
> I believe we could modify that to EACH_QUORUM or QUORUM consistency and no
> deletes - isnt that right?
>
yes.
Andrey, QUORUM consistency and no deletes makes perfect sense.
I believe we could modify that to EACH_QUORUM or QUORUM consistency and no
deletes - isnt that right ?
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Andrey Ilinykh wrote:
> 1. You don't have to repair if you use QUORUM consistency and yo
Thanks Mark,
Since we have replicas in each data center, addition of a new data center
(and new replicas) has a performance implication on nodetool repair.
I do understand that adding nodes without increasing number of replicas may
improve repair performance, but in this case we are adding new data
1. You don't have to repair if you use QUORUM consistency and you don't
delete data.
2.Performance depends on size of data each node has. It's very difficult to
predict. It may take days.
Thank you,
Andrey
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Viswanathan Ramachandran <
vish.ramachand...@gmail.com>
Hi Vish,
1. This tool repairs inconsistencies across replicas of the row. Since
> latest update always wins, I dont see inconsistencies other than ones
> resulting from the combination of deletes, tombstones, and crashed nodes.
> Technically, if data is never deleted from cassandra, then nodetool
