Anishek,
AFAIK you can not have clusters "overlap" each oder.
Just an idea: Try to address it as an sstable restore.
http://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/2.0/cassandra/operations/ops_snapshot_restore_new_cluster.html
What I would try to do (not tested!):
- create a logical DC in each cluster (
Hey Bryan,
Thanks for the info, we inferred as much, currently the only other thing we
were trying were trying to start two separate instances in Analytics
cluster on same set of machines to talk to respective individual DC's but
within 2 mins dropped that as we will have to change ports on atlas
I'm jumping into this thread late, so sorry if this has been covered
before. But am I correct in reading that you have two different Cassandra
rings, not talking to each other at all, and you want to have a shared DC
with a third Cassandra ring?
I'm not sure what you want to do is possible.
If I
Hey Guys,
We did the necessary changes and were trying to get this back on track, but
hit another wall,
we have two Clusters in Different DC ( DC1 and DC2) with cluster names (
CLUSTER_1, CLUSTER_2)
we want to have a common analytics cluster in DC3 with cluster name
(CLUSTER_3). -- looks like th
Hey Clint,
we have two separate rings which don't talk to each other but both having
the same DC name "DCX".
@Raja,
We had already gone towards the path you suggested.
thanks all
anishek
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Reddy Raja wrote:
> Yes. Here are the steps.
> You will have to change t
When you say you have two logical DC both with the same name are you saying
that you have two clusters of servers both with the same DC name, nether of
which currently talk to each other? IE they are two separate rings?
Or do you mean that you have two keyspaces in one cluster?
Or?
Clint
On Mar
Yes. Here are the steps.
You will have to change the DC Names first.
DC1 and DC2 would be independent clusters.
Create a new DC, DC3 and include these two DC's on DC3.
This should work well.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Clint Martin <
clintlmar...@coolfiretechnologies.com> wrote:
> When y
