Another approach you can take is to add the userid to the score like,
=> (column=140_uid2, value=[], timestamp=1268841641979)
and f you need the score time sorted you can add
=> (column=140_268841641979_uid2, value=[], timestamp=1268841641979)
But I do think that in any case you need to remove the
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Richard Grossman wrote:
> But in the case of simple column family I've the same problem when I update
> the score of 1 user then I need to remove his old score too. For example
> here the user uid5 was at 130 now he is at 140 because I add the random
> number cass
But in the case of simple column family I've the same problem when I update
the score of 1 user then I need to remove his old score too. For example
here the user uid5 was at 130 now he is at 140 because I add the random
number cassandra will keep all the score evolution.
get Keyspace2.topScoreUse
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Toby DiPasquale wrote:
>
> Couldn't you just use a supercolumn whose keys were the score and the
> subcolumns were username:true? Basically using the subcolumns as a
> list?
>
Sure, but that complicates getting the top N scores. You'd have to use the
OrderedPart
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Richard Grossman
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, But what do you mean by ?
>>
>>> pack a random integer after the score (so the sort order is maintained)
>>> in big endian format and only examine the first 8 byte
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Richard Grossman wrote:
> Thanks, But what do you mean by ?
>
> pack a random integer after the score (so the sort order is maintained) in
>> big endian format and only examine the first 8 bytes of the column upon
>> retrieval.
>>
>> -Brandon
>>
>
> Do I need to t
Thanks, But what do you mean by ?
pack a random integer after the score (so the sort order is maintained) in
> big endian format and only examine the first 8 bytes of the column upon
> retrieval.
>
> -Brandon
>
Do I need to take the score and add like -number like 100-1, 100-2, 100-3
etc... to pr
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Richard Grossman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I trying to find a model where I can keep the list of biggest score for
> users.
> it's seems simple but I'm stuck here .
> For example user1 score = 10
> user2 score = 20
> user3 score = 30