Re: KeyRange.token in 0.7.0

2010-08-24 Thread B. Todd Burruss
kew .. hadoop is on my list, has been on my list, will probably still be on the list tomorrow ;) On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 11:53 -0700, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > in other words you're reinventing hadoop. not really recommended, but > knock yourself out if that's what you want to do. :) > > On Tue, Aug

Re: KeyRange.token in 0.7.0

2010-08-24 Thread Jonathan Ellis
in other words you're reinventing hadoop. not really recommended, but knock yourself out if that's what you want to do. :) On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:28 PM, B. Todd Burruss wrote: > i just came across this and i use tokens in range queries because it is > an easy straightforward way to divide the

Re: KeyRange.token in 0.7.0

2010-08-24 Thread B. Todd Burruss
i just came across this and i use tokens in range queries because it is an easy straightforward way to divide the keyspace and operate on it using multiple threads and throttle the processing. maybe this is what hadoop does, i don't know much about hadoop. so i don't really agree that i'm doing i

Re: KeyRange.token in 0.7.0

2010-08-18 Thread Ran Tavory
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > (a) if you're using token queries and you're not hadoop, you're doing it > wrong > ah, didn't know that, so I guess I'll remove support for it from hector... > > (b) they are expected to be of the form generated by > TokenFactory.toString

Re: KeyRange.token in 0.7.0

2010-08-18 Thread Jonathan Ellis
(a) if you're using token queries and you're not hadoop, you're doing it wrong (b) they are expected to be of the form generated by TokenFactory.toString and fromString. You should not be generating them yourself. On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Ran Tavory wrote: > I'm a bit confused WRT KeyRan