Both data and system load are equal across all nodes and the smaller test
cluster also exhibits the same issue. tokens are balanced and total node size
is equivalent.
On May 3, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> So either (a) dynamic snitch is wrong or (b) those nodes really are
> more
So either (a) dynamic snitch is wrong or (b) those nodes really are
more heavily loaded than the others, and are correctly pushing queries
to other replicas.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Serediuk, Adam
wrote:
> I just ran a test and we do not see that behavior with dynamic snitch
> disabled.
I just ran a test and we do not see that behavior with dynamic snitch disabled.
All nodes appear to be doing local reads as expected.
On May 3, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Do you still see this behavior if you disable dynamic snitch?
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Serediuk
Do you still see this behavior if you disable dynamic snitch?
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Serediuk, Adam
wrote:
> We appear to have encountered an issue with cassandra 0.7.5 after upgrading
> from 0.7.2. While doing a batch read using a get_range_slice against the
> ranges an individual node
We appear to have encountered an issue with cassandra 0.7.5 after upgrading
from 0.7.2. While doing a batch read using a get_range_slice against the ranges
an individual node is master for we are able to reproduce consistently that the
last two nodes in the ring, regardless of the ring size (we
