t will actually return a correct result?
Thanks
From: Bowen Song mailto:bo...@bso.ng>>
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 5:13 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Trouble After Changing Replication Factor
You have RF=3 and both read & write
request will actually return a correct result?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> *From:* Bowen Song
> *Sent:* Monday, October 11, 2021 5:13 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Trouble After Changing Replication Factor
>
>
>
> You have RF=3
;
> Thanks
>
>
>
> *From:* Bowen Song
> *Sent:* Monday, October 11, 2021 5:13 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Trouble After Changing Replication Factor
>
>
>
> You have RF=3 and both read & write CL=1, which means you are asking
>
onday, October 11, 2021 5:13 PM
*To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Trouble After Changing Replication Factor
You have RF=3 and both read & write CL=1, which means you are asking
Cassandra to give up strong consistency in order to gain higher
availability and perhaps slight faster s
request will actually return a correct result?
Thanks
From: Bowen Song
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 5:13 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Trouble After Changing Replication Factor
You have RF=3 and both read & write CL=1, which means you are asking Cassandra
to give up st
You have RF=3 and both read & write CL=1, which means you are asking
Cassandra to give up strong consistency in order to gain higher
availability and perhaps slight faster speed, and that's what you get.
If you want to have strong consistency, you will need to make sure (read
CL + write CL) > R
