m looking forward to running this release. Was there any discussion around improving the communication of known issues with releases? Gregory From: Aaron Morton [mailto:aa...@thelastpickle.com] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 4:21 PMTo: user@cassandra.apache.orgSubject: Re: Request For 0.6.12
2011 4:21 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request For 0.6.12 Release
Gregory,
There is a vote going on for 0.6.12 now
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cassandra.apache.org/msg01808.html
If you have time grab the bin and give it a test
http://people.apache.org/~eevans
Aaron
On 1
Gregory, There is a vote going on for 0.6.12 now http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cassandra.apache.org/msg01808.htmlIf you have time grab the bin and give it a test http://people.apache.org/~eevans AaronOn 16 Feb, 2011,at 09:21 PM, Aaron Morton wrote:Have checked it's all in the 0.6 branch and aske
Have checked it's all in the 0.6 branch and asked the devs for a 0.6.12 release. Will let you know how it goes.cheersAaronOn 16 Feb, 2011,at 08:38 AM, Aaron Morton wrote:I worked on that ticket, will try to chase it up.AaronOn 15/02/2011, at 2:01 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:T
I worked on that ticket, will try to chase it up.
Aaron
On 15/02/2011, at 2:01 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> The latest official 0.6.x releases, 0.6.10 and 0.6.11, have a very serious
> bug/regression when performing some quorum reads (CASSANDRA-2081), which is
> fixed in the head of the 0.6 b