using Hector's SliceQuery() and reading into a List, or Astynax seem to
result in similar times too.
Thanks,
Arindam
-Original Message-
From: Arindam Barua [mailto:aba...@247-inc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 10:54 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: RE: Read lat
data in some scenarios, and so need to optimize that scenario.
Thanks,
Arindam
From: Roshni Rajagopal [mailto:roshni_rajago...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 4:53 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: RE: Read latency issue
Hi Arindam,
There were some changes for CQL3 for
gt; To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Read latency issue
> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 17:53:46 +
>
>
> Thanks for your responses.
>
> Just to be clear our table declaration looks something like this:
> CREATE TABLE sessionevents (
> atag text,
> col
---Original Message-
From: aaron morton [mailto:aa...@thelastpickle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 12:32 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Read latency issue
> Running a query to like "select * from where atag=", where
> 'atag' is the first column
he fastest. I hope someone can help investigate or share
> numbers from their tests.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Roshni
> >
> >
> > > From: dean.hil...@nrel.gov
> > > To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> > > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 06:41
very low, for a read of a row by key which should
> have been the fastest. I hope someone can help investigate or share numbers
> from their tests.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Roshni
>
>
> > From: dean.hil...@nrel.gov
> > To: user@cassandra.apache.org
&
Tue, 2 Oct 2012 06:41:09 -0600
> Subject: Re: Read latency issue
>
> Interesting results. With PlayOrm, we did a 6 node test of reading 100 rows
> from 1,000,000 using PlayOrm Scalable SQL. It only took 60ms. Maybe we have
> better hardware though??? We are using 7200 RPM drive
Interesting results. With PlayOrm, we did a 6 node test of reading 100 rows
from 1,000,000 using PlayOrm Scalable SQL. It only took 60ms. Maybe we have
better hardware though??? We are using 7200 RPM drives so nothing fancy on the
disk side of things. More nodes puts at a higher throughput
