On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Aditya Muralidharan
wrote:
> Thanks for the response. We're trying to get a general idea of the insert and
> retrieval performance, and we figured BinaryMemtable would be a great enabler
> for our bulk import scenarios. Normal thrift inserts are certainly fast, b
e our throughput.
Are you able to share some general performance numbers for thrift/avro/bmt?
Thanks.
AD
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Ellis [mailto:jbel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:23 PM
To: user
Subject: Re: Cassandra 0.7 beta3 BinaryMemtable and Superco
Before you dig into that, are you sure normal Thrift inserts are not
fast enough?
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Aditya Muralidharan
wrote:
> Pretty sure I could ask that better:
>
>
>
> Is it possible for me to perform RowMutations on BinaryMemtable for a
> ColumnFamily of type Super?
>
>
>
>
Pretty sure I could ask that better:
Is it possible for me to perform RowMutations on BinaryMemtable for a
ColumnFamily of type Super?
The bmt_example seems to say that it's possible, but cassandra 0.7 b3 seems to
disagree with the following:
ERROR [MutationStage:38] 2010-11-11 13:47:37,383
D
