Agree. We were planning same change and tested multiple scenarios with
conclusion that it needs downtime to be on safer side. With right
automation in place implementation can be made faster but not without
downtime at least in our case.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020, 1:26 PM Durity, Sean R
wrote:
> I pl
I plan downtime for changes to security settings like this. I could not come up
with a way to not have degraded access or inconsistent data or something else
bad. The foundational issue is that unencrypted nodes cannot communicate with
encrypted ones.
I depend on Cassandra’s high availability f
Thank you for the expedient answer. That is what we suspected and it's
helpful to get that confirmation.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:12 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> The optional setting in 4.0 is designed to fix this. Without optional, you
> basically have to take an outage - the only control you have i
The optional setting in 4.0 is designed to fix this. Without optional, you
basically have to take an outage - the only control you have is the nature
of that outage.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:50 AM Egan Neuhengen
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are trying to come up with a safe way to turn on internode
