of course. compaction is always O(N) with the size of the data
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Jeremy Davis
wrote:
> Reads, ok.. What about Compactions? Is the cost of compacting going to be
> ever increasing with the number of columns?
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Jonathan Ellis wro
Reads, ok.. What about Compactions? Is the cost of compacting going to be
ever increasing with the number of columns?
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> #16 is very simple: it allows you to make very large rows. That is all.
>
> Other things being equal, doing reads from
#16 is very simple: it allows you to make very large rows. That is all.
Other things being equal, doing reads from really big rows will be
slower (since the row index will take longer to read) and this patch
does not change this.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Jeremy Davis
wrote:
>
> https://i
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16
Can someone (Jonathan?) help me understand the performance characteristics
of this patch?
Specifically: If I have an open ended CF, and I keep inserting with ever
increasing column names (for example current Time), will things generally
work out
