On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Chris Burroughs
wrote:
> https://engineering.eventbrite.com/what-version-of-cassandra-should-i-run/
>
> Although by the simplistic version count hueirstic the sheer quantity of
> releases in the 2.0.x line would now satisfy the constraint.
Yes, I was specific ab
https://engineering.eventbrite.com/what-version-of-cassandra-should-i-run/
Although by the simplistic version count hueirstic the sheer quantity of
releases in the 2.0.x line would now satisfy the constraint.
On 05/29/2014 08:08 PM, Paulo Ricardo Motta Gomes wrote:
Hey,
We are considering up
Hey,
We are considering upgrading from 1.2 to 2.0, why don't you consider 2.0
ready for production yet, Robert? Have you wrote about this somewhere
already?
A bit off-topic in this discussion but it would be interesting to know,
your posts are generally very enlightening.
Cheers,
On Thu, May 2
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Vegard Berget wrote:
> I know this has been discussed before, and I know there are limitations to
> how many rows one partition key in practice can handle. But I am not sure
> if number of rows or total data is the deciding factor.
>
Both. In terms of data size,
Hi,
I know this has been discussed before, and I know there are
limitations to how many rows one partition key in practice can handle.
But I am not sure if number of rows or total data is the deciding
factor. I know the thrift interface well, but this is my first
project where we are actively usi
